Dexter Hughes v. Thomas Hundley

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Dexter Hughes v. Thomas Hundley

Opinion

___________

No. 95-2317 ___________

Dexter Hughes, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Southern District of Iowa. Thomas Hundley, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * ___________

Submitted: December 26, 1995

Filed: February 27, 1996 ___________

Before FAGG, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

Iowa state inmate Dexter Hughes appeals from the district court's1 denial of his habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We affirm.

Hughes brought this action claiming that his rights were violated when a prison disciplinary committee refused to call a witness Hughes had requested at his disciplinary hearing. It is undisputed that the witness was not present during the incident giving rise to the disciplinary charge. Based on that factor and other information in the record, we agree with the district court's conclusion that the witness's testimony would not have affected the outcome of the hearing. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R.

1 The Honorable Charles R. Wolle, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-2-

Reference

Status
Unpublished