Delanor Berry v. City of Little Rock
Opinion
___________ No. 95-3818 ___________
Delanor Berry; Jack Bennett; * Elmer Jackson; John Hutson; * Perry Scroggins; Ricky Armstrong,*
* Appellants, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the v. * Eastern District of Arkansas.
* The City of Little Rock, * [UNPUBLISHED]
* Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: July 3, 1996
Filed: August 23, 1996
___________ Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiffs appeal from the district court's1 dismissal of their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against the City of Little Rock, Arkansas, in which they challenged the constitutionality of Local Ordinance 16,659 and its application. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude that the district court's dismissal of the complaint was correct, and that an opinion on these matters would have no precedential value.
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.