United States v. Richard Hensley
United States v. Richard Hensley
Opinion
_____________
No. 96-1627EA _____________
United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * * Richard Hensley, * * Appellant. *
_____________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern No. 96-1754EA District of Arkansas. _____________ [UNPUBLISHED] United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * * Cynthia Hensley, * * Appellant. * _____________
Submitted: September 10, 1996
Filed: September 19, 1996 _____________
Before FAGG, HEANEY, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _____________
PER CURIAM.
Richard Hensley and Cynthia Hensley entered guilty pleas to possession with intent to deliver marijuana. On appeal, the Hensleys contend the district court improperly refused to suppress evidence gathered under an anticipatory search warrant. Specifically, the Hensleys challenge the probable cause basis for the anticipatory warrant. After a careful review of the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude the magistrate judge properly denied the Hensleys' motion to suppress. We thus affirm for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge's report adopted by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished