U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Richard Hensley

United States v. Richard Hensley
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Decided September 19, 1996

United States v. Richard Hensley

Opinion

_____________ No. 96-1627EA _____________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * * Richard Hensley, * * Appellant. * _____________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern No. 96-1754EA District of Arkansas. _____________ [UNPUBLISHED] United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * * Cynthia Hensley, * * Appellant. * _____________ Submitted: September 10, 1996 Filed: September 19, 1996 _____________ Before FAGG, HEANEY, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _____________

PER CURIAM.

Richard Hensley and Cynthia Hensley entered guilty pleas to possession with intent to deliver marijuana. On appeal, the Hensleys contend the district court improperly refused to suppress evidence gathered under an anticipatory search warrant. Specifically, the Hensleys challenge the probable cause basis for the anticipatory warrant. After a careful review of the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude the magistrate judge properly denied the Hensleys' motion to suppress. We thus affirm for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge's report adopted by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-2-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.