United States v. Oscar Solis Perales

_____________ No. 96-1725SI _____________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Southern v. * District of Iowa.

*

Oscar Solis Perales, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

_____________ Submitted: September 10, 1996 Filed: September 16, 1996 _____________

Before FAGG, Circuit Judge, HENLEY, Senior Circuit Judge, and

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Oscar Solis Perales appeals the district court's denial of Perales's motion to suppress. Perales contends the police concocted a traffic stop because they suspected Perales was engaged in drug-dealing activity. Contrary to Perales's view, the record shows the police had probable cause to believe Perales committed a traffic violation; thus, Perales's traffic- based detention was constitutionally reasonable. Whren v. United States, 116 S. Ct. 1769, 1777 (1996). We also reject Perales's contention that "the [traffic] stop was pretextual and therefore unconstitutional." Id. at 1774. Having considered all of Perales's arguments, we affirm the district court.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.