Raymond Ridenour v. Joe Class
Raymond Ridenour v. Joe Class
Opinion
___________
No. 96-1040 ___________
Raymond E. Ridenour, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of South Dakota. Joe Class, Warden, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: September 6, 1996
Filed: September 12, 1996 ___________
Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. ___________
PER CURIAM.
Raymond E. Ridenour, a South Dakota prisoner, pleaded guilty to forcibly raping a thirteen-year-old girl. Ridenour was initially sentenced to between seventeen and one-half and twenty years imprisonment, but he successfully sought a writ of habeas corpus in state court based on the sentencing judge's failure to question him concerning the voluntariness of his plea. On remand, Ridenour was resentenced to fifteen years with credit for time served, and the South Dakota Supreme Court affirmed. State v. Ridenour, No. 18655 (S.D. Oct. 25, 1994) (unpublished per curiam). Ridenour then filed the instant 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994) petition, which the District Court1 denied. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude that the District Court correctly denied Ridenour's petition. Accordingly, we affirm. See
The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota. 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Ridenour's motion for appointment of new counsel.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished