U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 1996

Raymond Ridenour v. Joe Class

Raymond Ridenour v. Joe Class
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Decided September 12, 1996

Raymond Ridenour v. Joe Class

Opinion

___________ No. 96-1040 ___________ Raymond E. Ridenour, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of South Dakota.

Joe Class, Warden, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * ___________ Submitted: September 6, 1996 Filed: September 12, 1996 ___________ Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM.

Raymond E. Ridenour, a South Dakota prisoner, pleaded guilty to forcibly raping a thirteen-year-old girl. Ridenour was initially sentenced to between seventeen and one-half and twenty years imprisonment, but he successfully sought a writ of habeas corpus in state court based on the sentencing judge's failure to question him concerning the voluntariness of his plea. On remand, Ridenour was resentenced to fifteen years with credit for time served, and the South Dakota Supreme Court affirmed. State v. Ridenour, No. 18655 (S.D. Oct. 25, 1994) (unpublished per curiam).

Ridenour then filed the instant 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994) petition, which the District Court1 denied. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude that the District Court correctly denied Ridenour's petition. Accordingly, we affirm. See

The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota.

8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Ridenour's motion for appointment of new counsel.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-2-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.