U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 1996

Virginia M. Binger v. H.M.A. Investments

Virginia M. Binger v. H.M.A. Investments
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Decided October 30, 1996

Virginia M. Binger v. H.M.A. Investments

Opinion

___________ No. 95-4261 ___________ Virginia M. Binger, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota.

H.M.A. Investments, Inc., a * Delaware corporation; Howard M. * [UNPUBLISHED] Appel, * * Appellants. *

___________ Submitted: October 25, 1996 Filed: October 30, 1996 ___________ Before BOWMAN, MAGILL, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.

H.M.A. Investments, Inc., a Philadelphia investment banking and consulting firm, and Howard M. Appel, its owner, appeal from the District Court's1 grant of summary judgment to plaintiff Virginia M. Binger in her diversity action seeking to enforce a promissory note. Having reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude the judgment of the District Court was correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.