Michael R. Ford v. Univ. of Arkansas
Michael R. Ford v. Univ. of Arkansas
Opinion
___________ No. 96-1290 ___________
Michael R. Ford, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas.
University of Arkansas Medical * Sciences; Service Master, Inc., * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * ____________ Submitted: September 25, 1996 Filed: October 2, 1996 ____________ Before BOWMAN, MAGILL, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.
_____________ PER CURIAM.
Michael Ford appeals from the district court's1 order dismissing his employment discrimination action for failure to comply with a court order.
The district court ordered Ford three times to respond to discovery requests, provided him an extension on each occasion, and expressly warned Ford in the second and third orders that a failure to respond by the designated deadline would result in the dismissal of his action. Thus, we conclude Ford's conduct demonstrated a clear pattern of intentional delay and unfairly prejudiced defendant's ability to complete discovery and prepare for trial. See First Gen. Resources Co. v. Elton Leather Corp., 958 F.2d 204, 206 (8th Cir. 1992).
The Honorable James Maxwell Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
Accordingly, we affirm.
A true copy.
ATTEST:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.