___________

No. 96-2900 ___________

United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * * Danilo Cajina, also known as * Danny, also known as Alex, * * Appellant. *

___________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western No. 96-2935 District of Missouri ___________

United States of America, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee, * * v. * * Camilo A. Cajina, Jr., also * known as Eddie, * * Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: December 10, 1996

Filed: December 13, 1996 ___________

Before FAGG, FLOYD R. GIBSON, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

Danilo and Camilo A. Cajina appeal their drug-related convictions and sentences. They contend the evidence is insufficient to support the jury's verdicts. They also contend the district court miscalculated the quantity of drugs attributable to them and thus failed properly to determine appropriate base offense levels for their sentences. Discussion of the issues presented by these appeals will serve no useful purpose. We have carefully considered the Cajinas' contentions and find them to be without merit. We affirm their convictions and sentences. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-2-