U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 1996

Day v. Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Decided May 22, 1996 · Fagg, Loken, McMillian

83 F.3d 1040; 1996 WL 271616 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

James C. ZalewsM, argued, Lincoln, NÉ, for appellant., David R. Buntain, argued, Lincoln, NE (John C. Wiltse, on the brief), for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Victor Day v. Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska Pill Soon Song (8th Cir. 1996)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Victor Day appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in Day’s civil rights action. Day v. Board of Regents, 911 F.Supp. 1228 (D.Neb. 1995). Day contends the University of Nebraska’s decision to pay him less than other professors in his department was age-based and deprived him of an array of constitutional rights. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, we conclude Day is not entitled to relief. Because the controlling law is clear, our review satisfies us that an opinion would have no precedential value. Accordingly, we affirm without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.