Famie Gaye v. First Commercial
Famie Gaye v. First Commercial
Opinion
___________
No. 96-2317 ___________
Famie Gaye, * * Appellant, * * v, * * First Commercial Corporation, * doing business as First * Commercial Bank; Roy Seiguist, * doing business as Pike Station, * Appeal from the United States formerly doing business as Ron's * District Court for the Auto; Luise Armstrong, in her * Eastern District of Arkansas. official capacity; Honorable * Joel Cole, in his official * [UNPUBLISHED] capacity; the City of North * Little Rock, * * Appellees, * * David Gill, * * Defendant. *
___________
Submitted: December 23, 1996
Filed: January 3, 1997 ___________
Before BOWMAN, MAGILL, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges. ___________
PER CURIAM.
Famie Gaye appeals from the district court's1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. The district court properly concluded Gaye failed to show a violation of her federal constitutional rights, and properly exercised its discretion in declining supplemental jurisdiction over her state
1 The HONORABLE WILLIAM R. WILSON, JR., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. law claims. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished