Cedric T. Jackson v. Timothy Sprickler
Cedric T. Jackson v. Timothy Sprickler
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 96-1914 ___________
Cedric Tyrone Jackson, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Timothy Sprickler; Unknown Kemp; * Moline Acres Police Department, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. * ___________
Submitted: February 21, 1997
Filed: February 27, 1997 ___________
Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges. ___________
PER CURIAM.
Cedric Jackson appeals from the district court's1 order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action with prejudice. The docket sheet entries indicate that the district court held a hearing after which it dismissed Jackson’s complaint. Jackson argues on appeal that he was treated unfairly at this hearing; however, he has neither provided nor requested a transcript. We thus cannot conduct meaningful review of the issues he raises on appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b); Schmid v. United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners of Am., 827 F.2d 384, 386 (8th Cir. 1987) (per curiam) (appellant must provide all parts of proceedings below necessary for reviewing any claimed error; appellate court unable to review
The HONORABLE CAROL E. JACKSON, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. certain issues raised by appellant in absence of transcript), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1071 (1988).
Based upon the record before us, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. Defendants’ motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished