U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 1997

Cedric T. Jackson v. Timothy Sprickler

Cedric T. Jackson v. Timothy Sprickler
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Decided February 27, 1997

Cedric T. Jackson v. Timothy Sprickler

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 96-1914 ___________ Cedric Tyrone Jackson, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri.

Timothy Sprickler; Unknown Kemp; * Moline Acres Police Department, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. * ___________ Submitted: February 21, 1997 Filed: February 27, 1997 ___________ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

Cedric Jackson appeals from the district court's1 order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action with prejudice. The docket sheet entries indicate that the district court held a hearing after which it dismissed Jackson’s complaint. Jackson argues on appeal that he was treated unfairly at this hearing; however, he has neither provided nor requested a transcript. We thus cannot conduct meaningful review of the issues he raises on appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b); Schmid v. United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners of Am., 827 F.2d 384, 386 (8th Cir. 1987) (per curiam) (appellant must provide all parts of proceedings below necessary for reviewing any claimed error; appellate court unable to review

The HONORABLE CAROL E. JACKSON, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. certain issues raised by appellant in absence of transcript), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1071 (1988).

Based upon the record before us, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. Defendants’ motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-2-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.