United States v. Edward Earl Wright

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

United States v. Edward Earl Wright

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 96-3585 ___________

United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Edward Earl Wright, also known * Eastern District of Missouri. as James Hill, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: February 4, 1997

Filed: February 14, 1997 ___________

Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

Edward Earl Wright appeals the sentence imposed by the 1 district court after he pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute cocaine base and distributing more than 50 grams of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. We affirm.

Wright’s presentence report indicated a Guidelines sentencing range of 360 months to life, noting that a 120-month mandatory- minimum penalty was applicable. At sentencing, the government moved for a downward departure under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines

1 The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. Manual § 5K1.1, p.s. (1995). The district court departed and

-2- sentenced Wright to 180 months imprisonment and five years supervised release, stating the mandatory minimum was not a severe enough penalty given Wright's criminal history and the nature of the offense.

On appeal, Wright contends the court erred in not departing further and not imposing the mandatory minimum. We may not review the extent of the court’s downward departure, however, regardless of its reasons for not departing further. See United States v. Dutcher, 8 F.3d 11, 12 (8th Cir. 1993).

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-3-

Reference

Status
Unpublished