Dennis Lee v. AR Farm Bureau Fed.
Dennis Lee v. AR Farm Bureau Fed.
Opinion
___________
No. 96-2058 ___________
Dennis Lee, and all other * automobile insurance policy * holders/members of Arkansas * Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance * Company of Arkansas, Inc., and * Southern Farm Bureau Casualty * Insurance Company, * * Plaintiff/Appellant, * * Arkansas Farm Bureau Mutual * Insurance Company of Arkansas, * Inc., Members/Holders of Auto- * mobile Insurance Policies; * Southern Farm Bureau Casualty * Insurance Company, Members/ * Holders of Automobile Insurance * Policies, * * Plaintiffs, * * v. * * Arkansas Farm Bureau Federation,* An Incorporated Entity or, * Alternatively, AR Farm Bureau * Federation, An Unincorporated * Association - Andrew Whisenhunt,* * Defendant/Appellee. * ___________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the No. 96-2180 Western District of Arkansas. ___________ [UNPUBLISHED] Dennis Lee, and all other * automobile insurance policy * holders/members of Arkansas * Farm Bureau Insurance Company * of Arkansas, Inc., and Southern * Farm Bureau; * * Plaintiff/Appellee, * * Arkansas Farm Bureau Mutual * Insurance Company of Arkansas, * Inc., Members/Holders of Auto- * mobile Insurance Policies; * Southern Farm Bureau Casualty * Insurance Company, Members/ * Holders of Automobile Insurance * Policies, * * Plaintiffs, * * v. * * Arkansas Farm Bureau Federation,* An Incorporated Entity or, * Alternatively, AR Farm Bureau * Federation, An Unincorporated * Association - Andrew Whisenhunt,* * Defendant/Appellant. * ___________
Submitted: January 15, 1997
Filed: February 6, 1997 ___________
Before BOWMAN, MURPHY, Circuit Judges, and JONES,1 District Judge.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Appellant brought this action with allegations Appellee committed violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1962(a),(c), and (d) in the operation of the 2 Arkansas Farm Bureau Federation. The district court granted summary judgment to Appellee. After a careful review of the record and the parties’ briefs, we conclude the judgment of the district court was correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. The Cross-Appeal is dismissed as moot. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
1 The HONORABLE JOHN B. JONES, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota, sitting by designation. 2 The Honorable Harry F. Barnes, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, El Dorado Division.
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished