U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 1997

Jerry A. Woodke v. Patrick Cody

Jerry A. Woodke v. Patrick Cody
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Decided May 30, 1997

Jerry A. Woodke v. Patrick Cody

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _____________ No. 96-3600NI _____________ Jerry A. Woodke, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Patrick Cody, doing business as * Appeal from the United States Hawkeye Manufacturing of South * District Court for the Northern Dakota, Inc., doing business as Truck * District of Iowa. Trailer Sales of Yankton, Inc.; Henry J. * Petersen, doing business as Hawkeye * [UNPUBLISHED] Manufacturing of South Dakota, Inc., * doing business as Truck Trailer Sales of * Yankton, Inc., * * Appellees. * _____________ Submitted: May 23, 1997 Filed: May 30, 1997 _____________ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. _____________ PER CURIAM.

Jerry A. Woodke appeals the judgment entered on an adverse jury verdict in his action for breach of a joint venture agreement and for an accounting. Having searched the record and considered the parties' briefs, we find no merit in Woodke's contentions.

The district court's instructions were adequate as given. Anyway, to the extent that Woodke complains the district court should have given his damage-related instruction, the district court's refusal to give the instruction is harmless because the jury found against Woodke on the merits.

We also reject Woodke's contention that the district court abused its discretion in refusing to admit certain documents offered by Woodke. Woodke testified about the production costs contained in the challenged documents and put other cost-related documents into evidence; thus, the challenged evidence was merely cumulative of Woodke's testimony and other documentary evidence.

Accordingly we affirm the district court.

A true copy.

Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-2-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.