Paul A. Bonacci v. Alan Baer
Paul A. Bonacci v. Alan Baer
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 96-1347 ___________ Paul A. Bonacci, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Lawrence King; Peter Citron, * * Defendants, * * Appeal from the United States Alan Baer, * District Court for the * District of Nebraska.
Appellee, * * Robert Wadman; Michael Hoch; * [Unpublished] City of Omaha, a municipal * corporation; Grand Jury, * Douglas County; The Catholic * Archbishop, of Omaha, * * Defendants. * ___________ Submitted: April 29, 1997 Filed: May 7, 1997 ___________ Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM.
Paul A. Bonacci appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment to Alan Baer in Bonacci's action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, and 1986. We conclude the court's alternative holdings--that Bonacci did not show he was a member of a traditionally disadvantaged group protected under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3), and that Bonacci presented no evidence to establish a conspiracy--are correct.
Bonacci has not challenged the dismissal of his supplemental state law claims. Having reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.