Aretha Atwater v. Fed. Ex. Corp.
Aretha Atwater v. Fed. Ex. Corp.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 97-1218 ___________ Aretha A. Atwater, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Northern District of Iowa. Federal Express Corporation, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * ___________ Submitted: October 2, 1997 Filed: October 10, 1997 ___________ Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM.
Aretha Atwater appeals the district court&s1 grant of summary judgment to her former employer in her employment discrimination lawsuit. Having carefully considered the record and the parties& submissions, we agree with the district court that even assuming that Atwater
The Honorable Edward J. McManus, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa. established the elements of a prima facie case, she failed to establish a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Federal Express&s articulated
-2- reasons for the adverse employment action were a pretext for race or sex discrimination. We also agree with the district court that Atwater&s related retaliation claim cannot survive summary judgment.
The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-3-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.