United States v. Roland M. Evans
United States v. Roland M. Evans
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _____________
No. 97-1044WM _____________
United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Western v. * District of Missouri. * Roland Mark Evans, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * _____________
Submitted: November 18, 1997 Filed: November 26, 1997 _____________
Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. _____________
PER CURIAM.
Roland Mark Evans appeals his sentence for computer and credit card fraud. After a careful review of the record, we reject Evans's arguments. First, contrary to Evans's view, the government's evidence and Evans's stipulation about the amount of loss support the district court's loss calculation. Second, the record amply supports the district court's refusal to reduce Evans's base offense level for acceptance of responsibility. Finally, we agree with Evans that the sentencing transcript permits us to consider Evans's ineffective assistance of counsel arguments, and having done so, we conclude Evans has failed to show that he was prejudiced by his counsel's performance. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished