United States v. Dewaine Summerhill
United States v. Dewaine Summerhill
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _____________
No. 97-2101WA _____________
United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * * Dewaine Summerhill, * * Appellant. *
_____________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western No. 97-2102WA District of Arkansas. _____________ [UNPUBLISHED] United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * * Robert Patrick Hickey, * * Appellant. * _____________
Submitted: December 9, 1997 Filed: December 17, 1997 _____________
Before FAGG, BEAM, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. _____________
PER CURIAM.
Dewaine Summerhill and Robert Patrick Hickey appeal their fraud-related convictions. Summerhill and Hickey contend the district court improperly denied their motions for a continuance to prepare for trial. Additionally, Summerhill raises contentions related to the district court's refusal to grant Summerhill's motion for a separate trial and the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury's verdicts. A review of the record shows the parties' claims are without merit. Because the appeal involves the straightforward application of settled principles of law, a discussion will serve no useful purpose. We thus affirm the convictions of Summerhill and Hickey without an extended opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished