William W. Swanson v. Frank Wood
William W. Swanson v. Frank Wood
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _____________
No. 97-2013MN _____________
William W. Swanson; * * Petitioner-Appellant, * * Thomas W. Bock; John Edward Allen; * Brian L. Reigstad; Alan A. Orfi; Harry * Gardner; Jeffrey A. Sebeck; Steven * Krusel; Charles W. Ware; Charles R. * Mitchell; Bruce Virgil Robinson; * Richard J. Kellogg; Jason Hart; Jeffrey * Appeal from the United States P. Hess; Brian J. Laramy; Lyf C. * District Court for the District Wildenberg; Kevin Lamont Howard, * of Minnesota. * Petitioners, * [UNPUBLISHED] * v. * * Frank Wood; Dennis Benson; Fred G. * Lafleur; Mary Hogan, of Minnesota * Department of Corrections, or their * successors, * * Respondents-Appellees. * _____________
Submitted: February 6, 1998 Filed: February 11, 1998 _____________
Before FAGG, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. _____________ PER CURIAM.
William W. Swanson appeals the district court's denial of Swanson's petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Swanson contends corrections officers misconstrued the state's "good time" statute in violation of Swanson's constitutional rights. Having reviewed the record and the parties' submissions, we conclude the district court's judgment was correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished