U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 1998

James E. Mooney v. State of Minnesota

James E. Mooney v. State of Minnesota
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Decided May 27, 1998

James E. Mooney v. State of Minnesota

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 98-1356 ___________ James E. Mooney, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota.

State of Minnesota, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * ___________ Submitted: May 26, 1998 Filed: May 27, 1998 ___________ Before BOWMAN, Chief Judge, WOLLMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM.

James E. Mooney appeals from the district court&s1 denial of his motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissal of his complaint prior to service pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Liberally construing Mr. Mooney&s complaint and

The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable Jonathan G. Lebedoff, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. accepting his contention that he sued the Minnesota Department of Corrections and state agents in their “official capacity,” we conclude his action requesting declaratory relief for conduct that occurred over thirty-five years earlier was barred by the Eleventh Amendment. See Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Auth. v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc., 506 U.S. 139, 146 (1993); Pennhurst State Sch. & Hosp. v. Halderman, 465 U.S. 89, 99- (1984). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-2-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.