U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 1998

Dennis Brooks v. James McKinney

Dennis Brooks v. James McKinney
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Decided May 1, 1998

Dennis Brooks v. James McKinney

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 97-3809 ___________ Dennis Brooks, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the James McKinney; Terry E. Branstad; * Southern District of Iowa. Russell Rogerson; John Klpfist, C/O; * Chambers, C/O; Jerry Connelly, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. * ___________ Submitted: April 29, 1998 Filed: May 1, 1998 ___________ Before BOWMAN, Chief Judge, WOLLMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM.

Dennis Brooks, an Iowa inmate, appeals from the district court&s1 order denying his request for a preliminary injunction in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit. We affirm.

The Honorable Robert W. Pratt, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. Brooks alleged in his suit that he was housed in the same cell with one inmate who had hepatitis and another who was HIV positive, and that defendant Jerry Connelly thereafter refused to have Brooks tested for the diseases. Brooks sought a preliminary injunction ordering defendants to release him for testing outside the prison.

Brooks does not dispute, however, that he has since been tested at the facility where he is currently housed. After careful review we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion when it denied preliminary injunctive relief after considering the factors listed in Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc., 640 F.2d 109, 113 (8th Cir. 1981) (en banc). See Stuart Hall Co. v. Ampad Corp., 51 F.3d 780, 784 (8th Cir. 1995) (standard of review). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-2-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.