United States v. Frederick L. Jackson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

United States v. Frederick L. Jackson

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _____________

No. 98-2087EA

United States of America, * * * v. District of Arkansas.

Frederick Lee Jackson, [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. _____________

Filed: January 22, 1999

Before FAGG, HEANEY, and WOLLMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

ederick o ibute ) nd 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (a)(1)(B)(i) (1994). Jackson contends the district court mitted ) of certain assets associated with drug trafficking into drug quantities fo sentencing because the PSR included assets titled in the names of other people. W disa officer stated, Mr. Jackson’s. . . . If it had anyone else’s record contains no evidence disputing the accuracy of the probation officer’s explanatory statement, and thus the district court did not commit clear error by accepting the PSR calculation. See , 21 F.3d 243, 247-48, 249- r. 1994); United States v. Wise (en banc); United States v. Haren

We thus affirm Jackson’s sentence.

A true copy.

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-2-

Reference

Status
Unpublished