U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 1999

Donald Cayce v. Amerisure Ins. Co.

Donald Cayce v. Amerisure Ins. Co.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Decided February 18, 1999

Donald Cayce v. Amerisure Ins. Co.

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _____________ No. 98-2991EM _____________ Donald Cayce, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Missouri.

Amerisure Insurance Company of * Detroit, Michigan, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _____________ Submitted: February 11, 1999 Filed: February 18, 1999 _____________ Before BOWMAN, Chief Judge, and FAGG and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. _____________ PER CURIAM.

Donald Cayce appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment in Cayce's action to recover for injures suffered in an automobile accident under the uninsured and underinsured provisions of his policy with Amerisure Insurance Company of Detroit, Michigan. We review a grant of summary judgment under a well-established standard. Because this is a diversity action, we review de novo questions of state law. Having considered the record and the parties' briefs, we are satisfied the district court correctly applied the controlling law and the record supports the district court's ruling. Because a comprehensive opinion in this diversity case would lack precedential value, we affirm on the basis of the district court's ruling without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-2-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.