Roosevelt Smith v. Lucent Technologies
Roosevelt Smith v. Lucent Technologies
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 98-3983 ___________ Roosevelt J. Smith, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri Lucent Technologies, Inc.; John L. * Cimino; Christopher P. Cummings, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * ___________ Submitted: May 7, 1999 Filed: May 24, 1999 ___________ Before HANSEN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM.
Roosevelt J. Smith brought an employment discrimination action against Lucent Technologies (Lucent), John L. Cimino, and Christopher P. Cummings. The district court1 dismissed the action with prejudice for failure to state a claim and for failure to prosecute and comply with the court’s orders. Mr. Smith appeals, arguing for the first time that the district court should have compelled arbitration, as the Federal Arbitration The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
Act and the union contract with Lucent required arbitration. We do not consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal. See Dorothy J. v. Little Rock Sch. Dist., 7 F.3d 729, 734 (8th Cir. 1993).
Accordingly, we affirm.
A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.