United States v. David Rowe
United States v. David Rowe
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 98-3687 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * * David Allen Rowe, * * Appellant. * ___________ Appeals from the United States No. 98-3805 District Court for the ___________ District of South Dakota.
United States of America, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee, * * v. * * Michael Lee Kasdorf, * * Appellant. * __________ Submitted: May 11, 1999 Filed: May 19, 1999 ___________ Before MCMILLIAN, HEANEY, and FAGG, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM.
David Allen Rowe and Michael Lee Kasdorf were convicted by a jury for counterfeiting offenses and sentenced to fifty and twenty months, respectively. In this joint appeal, Rowe appeals the district court’s enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2B5.1 and its imposition of periodic polygraph examinations as an additional condition of his supervised release. Kasdorf appeals the district court’s refusal to instruct the jury on the defense of coercion and its response to a jury question.
We have carefully reviewed the record and conclude that the district court committed no error. Because an extended discussion of the merits is unnecessary, we affirm on the basis of the district court’s ruling. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest.
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.