Herbert Malone v. Brent Scott
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 98-2514 ___________ Herbert Phillip Malone, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Brent Scott, Infirmary Manager, * Eastern District of Arkansas.
Cummins Unit, Arkansas Department * of Correction; Mary Wyatt, Infirmary * [UNPUBLISHED] Records Supervisor, Cummins Unit, * Arkansas Department of Correction, * * Appellees. * ___________ Submitted: May 6, 1999 Filed: May 11, 1999 ___________ Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and BEAM, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM.
Herbert P. Malone appeals the judgment of the district court1 dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action following a jury verdict in favor of defendants. Upon careful review of Malone’s brief and the record, we conclude that his arguments either are unreviewable because he did not provide a trial transcript, see Fed. R. App. P. 10(b); Van Treese v. Blome, 7 F.3d 729, 729 (8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam), or are meritless.
We also deny his motion for a remand. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.