United States v. James Felician Stead

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

United States v. James Felician Stead

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________

No. 99-1154 ___________

United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the District * of South Dakota. James Felician Stead, Sr., also * known as Felician James Stead, Sr., * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * ___________

Submitted: September 7, 1999 Filed: September 14, 1999 ___________

Before BOWMAN, FAGG, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

After a jury trial, James Felician Stead, Sr., was convicted of aggravated sexual abuse of a minor. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 1153, 2241(c), and 2246(2). On appeal, Stead challenges the constitutionality of Federal Rule of Evidence 413, which allows evidence of similar crimes in sexual assault cases. Stead's challenge, however, is foreclosed by this court's decision in United States v. Mound, 149 F.3d 799 (8th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 119 S. Ct. 842 (1999). Stead also contends the district court abused its discretion under Federal Rules of Evidence 403 and 413 by admitting evidence of a past conviction for lewd conduct with a minor. A review of the record shows that Stead's contention is without merit. See Mound, 149 F.3d at 801-02 (finding no abuse of discretion where district court undertook Rule 403 balancing, past conviction was for conduct similar to current charged conduct, and there was no evidence past conviction presented any danger of unfair prejudice beyond that presented by all propensity evidence allowed by Rule 413). We affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-2-

Reference

Status
Unpublished