U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 1999

Ramona Einfalt v. William Henderson

Ramona Einfalt v. William Henderson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Decided October 4, 1999
Ramona Einfalt v. William Henderson

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 99-1626 ___________

Ramona Einfalt, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the

* District of Nebraska.

William Henderson, Postmaster * General, United States Postal Service, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: October 1, 1999 Filed: October 4, 1999 ___________

Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.

In this employment discrimination action, Ramona Einfalt appeals the district court&s1 grant of summary judgment in favor of her employer. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties& submissions, we conclude that the district court did not err in granting summary judgment, because Einfalt failed to show that USPS&s reasons were pretextual and that the actual reason she was not promoted was age discrimination. Further, Einfalt failed to establish a cause of action for retaliation. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

1 The HONORABLE JOSEPH F. BATAILLON, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.