Andrew Elliott v. Kenneth S. Apfel
Andrew Elliott v. Kenneth S. Apfel
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________
No. 99-2708 ___________
Andrew Elliott, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Missouri. * Kenneth S. Apfel, Social Security * [UNPUBLISHED] Administration, * * Appellee. * ___________
Submitted: November 24, 1999
Filed: December 2, 1999 ___________
Before BOWMAN, FAGG, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. ___________
PER CURIAM.
Andrew Elliott sought judicial review when his social security claim was denied. The district court ordered him twice over a three-year period to file a motion for summary judgment, but he did not do so. The district court then dismissed his complaint without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Elliott appeals. Having reviewed the record and the briefs, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the complaint. See Garland v. Peebles, 1 F.3d 683, 686 (8th Cir. 1993) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished