Jose Figueroa-Catano v. John Ault
Jose Figueroa-Catano v. John Ault
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 99-2919 ___________ Jose Figueroa-Catano, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Northern District of Iowa. * John Ault, Warden, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * ___________ Submitted: May 12, 2000 Filed: May 17, 2000 ___________ Before BOWMAN and LOKEN, Circuit Judges, and BATAILLON,1 District Judge. ___________ PER CURIAM.
Jose Figueroa-Catano appeals from the order of the District Court2 denying Figueroa-Catano's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The sole issue presented for our review is whether trial counsel was ineffective by reason of
The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska, sitting by designation.
The Honorable Donald E. O'Brien, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa. failing to move for suppression of Figueroa-Catano's videotaped statement on the grounds that Figueroa-Catano was so intoxicated that his waiver of his Miranda rights was not voluntary. The District Court determined that trial counsel's performance was not deficient in this respect, and we agree. Because an opinion would add nothing of substance to the District Court's thorough and well-reasoned order, without further discussion the decision of the District Court is AFFIRMED. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.