U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 2000

United States v. Michael Graham

United States v. Michael Graham
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Decided July 21, 2000

United States v. Michael Graham

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 00-1433 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Missouri. * Michael Graham, also known as * [UNPUBLISHED] Michael Gatewood, * * Appellant. * ___________ Submitted: July 7, 2000 Filed: July 21, 2000 ___________ Before LOKEN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM.

Michael Graham appeals the district court's imposition of a third term of supervised release following revocation of a second term of supervised release. For reversal, Graham argues his revocation sentence violates ex post facto and due process principles because 18 U.S.C. § 3583(h) was applied to him even though it was enacted after he committed the underlying offense of conviction. We rejected this argument in United States of St. John, 92 F.3d 761 (8th Cir. 1996), and reject it again today.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-2-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.