United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 00-1585 ___________ Daniel Hanic, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Jeff Bloomberg, Secretary D.O.C.; * District of South Dakota.

Douglas Weber, Warden SDSP; * John and Jane Doe, Inmate Account * [UNPUBLISHED] Employees, * * Appellees. * ___________ Submitted: October 19, 2000 Filed: October 24, 2000 ___________ Before BEAM, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM.

South Dakota inmate Daniel Hanic appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action challenging South Dakota Department of Corrections Policy No. 1B.10. In addition to raising a procedural challenge to the application of the policy to him, Hanic claimed that the policy violated

The Honorable John B. Jones, Senior United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota. substantive due process and his Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable seizures.

Having conducted a de novo review, we reject Hanic’s challenge for the reasons explained in the district court’s thorough opinion. See Tillman v. Lebanon County Correctional Facility, 221 F.3d 410, 421-22 (3d Cir. 2000); Parrish v. Mallinger, 133 F.3d 612, 615 (8th Cir. 1998); Mahers v. Halford, 76 F.d 951, 954-56 (8th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1091 (1997).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-2-