United States v. Halbert Bell

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

United States v. Halbert Bell

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________

No. 00-2133 ___________

United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Halbert Bell, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. * ___________

Submitted: August 22, 2000 Filed: October 16, 2000 ___________

Before McMILLIAN, BRIGHT, and BEAM, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

Halbert Bell pleaded guilty to possessing a firearm, having previously been convicted of three violent felonies, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(e)(1). The district court1 sentenced him to 180 months' imprisonment (the statutory minimum) and three years' supervised release. On appeal, Bell's counsel has filed a brief and moved to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

1 The Honorable James Maxwell Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. Although Bell was granted permission to file a pro se supplemental brief, he has not done so.

After review of counsel's Anders' brief, along with our independent review of the record in accordance with Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we conclude that there are no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court, and we grant counsel's motion to withdraw.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-2-

Reference

Status
Unpublished