United States v. Cheron Crawford

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

United States v. Cheron Crawford

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________

No. 99-3226 ___________

United States of America, * * Appeal from the United States Appellee, * District Court for the Western * District of Missouri v. * * [UNPUBLISHED] Cheron Monique Crawford, * * Appellant. * ___________

Submitted: September 14, 2000 Filed: October 13, 2000 ___________

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD and HANSEN, Circuit Judges, and BATTEY,1 District Judge. ___________

PER CURIAM.

Cheron Monique Crawford appeals her conviction for conspiracy and aiding and abetting the robbery of the Hillcrest Bank in Blue Springs, Missouri. Crawford claims that the government produced insufficient evidence to support the verdict.

We believe an extended discussion of Crawford's fact specific argument would serve no useful purpose because the law is clear. Crawford's argument was presented to the jury which returned a verdict contrary to Crawford's version of those facts. See United States v. Schubel, 912 F.2d 952, 955 (8th Cir. 1990) (a defendant's conviction must

1 The Honorable Richard H. Battey, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota, sitting by designation. be upheld if there is substantial evidence to support the jury's verdict). Substantial evidence did exist. We affirm Crawford's conviction. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-2-

Reference

Status
Unpublished