Michael L. Haynes v. Kenneth S. Apfel
Michael L. Haynes v. Kenneth S. Apfel
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________
No. 99-2994 ___________
Michael L. Haynes, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, * Social Security Administration, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * ___________
Submitted: October 5, 2000 Filed: October 12, 2000 ___________
Before BEAM, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges. ___________
PER CURIAM.
Michael L. Haynes appeals the district court’s1 grant of summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner of Social Security, upholding the Commissioner’s cessation of Haynes’s disability insurance benefits based on a finding that alcoholism was a contributing factor material to his disability. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, we conclude substantial evidence supported the Commissioner’s
1 The Honorable Jerry W. Cavaneau, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). decision. See 42 U.S.C. § 423(d)(2)(C) (“An individual shall not be considered to be disabled for purposes of this subchapter if alcoholism or drug addiction would . . . be a contributing factor material to the Commissioner’s determination that the individual is disabled.”); Pettit v. Apfel, 218 F.3d 901, 903 (8th Cir. 2000) (claimant has initial burden of showing that alcoholism or drug addiction is not material to finding of disability); Rehder v. Apfel, 205 F.3d 1056, 1059 (8th Cir. 2000) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished