United States v. John F. Jackman
United States v. John F. Jackman
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________
No. 99-4053 ___________
United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. John F. Jackman, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. * ___________
Submitted: November 7, 2000 Filed: November 24, 2000 ___________
Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, BRIGHT, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. ___________
PER CURIAM.
John Jackman pleaded guilty to receiving stolen property, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2315, and the district court1 sentenced him to 8 months confinement and 2 years supervised release. On appeal, his counsel has filed a brief and moved to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Jackman has filed a pro se supplemental brief. They both argue that Jackman received ineffective assistance of counsel.
1 The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. Jackman’s ineffective-assistance claims--and his related claim that his guilty plea was invalid--should be presented in 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceedings. See United States v. Martin, 59 F.3d 767, 771 (8th Cir. 1995). Having reviewed the record independently pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished