Roger Clausen appeals from the District Court’s 1 grant of summary judgment to defendants in his action against North Central Blood Services and Immanuel-St. Joseph’s Hospital under theories of negligence, strict liability, breach of warranty, and negligent misrepresentation.

To establish each of his pleaded claims, Clausen had to demonstrate that contaminated blood was the proximate cause of his injury. After de novo review, we conclude the judgment was proper because the un-controverted evidence clearly demonstrated an absence of causation. See Dulany v. Carnahan, 132 F.3d 1234, 1237 (8th Cir. 1997) (standard of review); Smith v. Brut-ger Co., 569 N.W.2d 408, 423-14 (Minn. 1997) (negligent misrepresentation); Johnson v. Minnesota, 553 N.W.2d 40, 49 (Minn. 1996) (negligence); Drager by Gutz-man v. Aluminum Indus. Corp., 495 N.W.2d 879, 882 (Minn.App. 1993) (strict products liability); Craft Tool & Die Co. v. Payne, 385 N.W.2d 24, 26 (Minn.App. 1986) (breach of warranty). We also conclude the District Court did not abuse its discretion in denying Clausen’s motion for a continuance. See Dulany, 132 F.3d at 1238 (standard of review); United States v. Light, 766 F.2d 394, 397-98 (8th Cir. 1985) (per curiam) (nonmoving party must show that opposition is meritorious, and must affirmatively demonstrate how postponement of ruling will enable him to rebut moving party’s showing of absence of genuine issue of fact).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.