Charles Armstrong v. Harrison Family
Charles Armstrong v. Harrison Family
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________
No. 00-3156 ___________
Charles Armstrong, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern Harrison Family; McQuay Family; * District of Missouri. Vinita Park Police Department; Ku * Klux Klan, Overland, Missouri; Ku * (UNPUBLISHED) Klux Klan, State of Missouri, * * Appellees. * ___________
Submitted: December 22, 2000
Filed: January 5, 2001 ___________
Before McMILLIAN, BOWMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. ___________
PER CURIAM.
Charles Armstrong appeals the district court’s1 order dismissing his pro se civil rights complaint against multiple defendants. After careful review of the record, we
1 The Honorable Donald J. Stohr, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. conclude that Mr. Armstrong’s complaint was frivolous and failed to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), (ii); Bray v. Alexandria Women’s Health Clinic, 506 U.S. 263, 267-68 (1993); Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989); West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48 (1988); Monell v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 691-95 (1978). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished