Charles Davidson v. Paula Casey

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Charles Davidson v. Paula Casey, 3 F. App'x 574 (8th Cir. 2001)

Charles Davidson v. Paula Casey

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Charles Davidson appeals the district court’s 1 order dismissing his suit alleging state and federal claims against several Arkansas public officials and private individuals. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ submissions, we conclude Davidson did not state a claim pursuant to the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1962. Because Davidson asserted no other basis for federal jurisdiction, we also conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Davidson’s remaining claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). Accordingly, we affirm, and we deny all pending motions.

1

. The HONORABLE STEPHEN M. REASONER, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Reference

Full Case Name
Charles Edwin DAVIDSON, Appellant, v. Paula CASEY, Et Al., Appellees
Status
Unpublished