Luis Yair Gutierrez-Lopez pleaded guilty to illegally re-entering the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). His sentence was enhanced under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and U .S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A) because he had previously been deported after being convicted of an aggravated felony. The district court 1 sentenced him to 78 months imprisonment and 3 years supervised release.

Gutierrez-Lopez argues on appeal that because the fact of a prior aggravated-felony conviction was not alleged in the indictment and was neither proven to a jury nor admitted through his guilty plea, the enhanced sentence violates the standards announced in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). We reject this argument because Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 226, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which upheld the validity of the section 1326(b)(2) aggravated-felony enhancement for section 1326(a) violators, was not overruled by Apprendi. See 120 S.Ct. at 2362; United States v. Aguayo-Delgado, 220 F.3d 926, 932 n. 4 (8th Cir.) (“In Apprendi, the Court left Almendarez-Torres untouched, although ... [it] expressed a willingness to reconsider it.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 600, 148 L.Ed.2d 513 (2000). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.