Littrell v. Equitable Life Assurance Society

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Littrell v. Equitable Life Assurance Society, 5 F. App'x 568 (8th Cir. 2001)

Littrell v. Equitable Life Assurance Society

Opinion

*569 [UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Georgia Littrell appeals the District Court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her denial-of-benefits action arising under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act. We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. DuMond v. Centex Corp., 172 F.3d 618, 621 (8th Cir. 1999). “In reviewing a grant of summary judgment, this Court views the record in the light most favorable to the non-moving party to ensure there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the moving party is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law.” Id. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, we affirm. Littrell has presented no legal or factual basis for reversing the District Court’s judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Reference

Full Case Name
Georgia LITTRELL, Appellant, v. EQUITABLE LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY, Appellee
Status
Unpublished