United States v. Eduardo Olvera-Yanez
United States v. Eduardo Olvera-Yanez
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________
No. 00-3852 ___________
United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eduardo Olvera-Yanez, also known as * District of Nebraska. Jose G. DeLeon, also known as * Eduardo Olvera, also known as * [UNPUBLISHED] Eduardo O. Olvera, also known as * Eduardo G. Yanez, also known as * Eudardo O. Yanez, also known as Jose * Guadalupe Ledesma-Deleon, also * known as Jose Guadalupe Ledesma, * * Appellant. * ___________
Submitted: February 6, 2001 Filed: March 6, 2001 ___________
Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and BYE, Circuit Judges. ___________
PER CURIAM.
Eduardo Olvera-Yanez pleaded guilty to illegally re-entering the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). His sentence was enhanced under section 1326(b)(2) and U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A) because he had previously been deported after being convicted of an aggravated felony. The district court1 sentenced him to 77 months imprisonment and 2 years supervised release.
Olvera-Yanez argues on appeal, as he did below, that the fact of his prior aggravated-felony conviction had to be charged in the indictment and proven beyond a reasonable doubt because Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), is no longer good law in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 120 S. Ct. 2348 (2000). We reject this argument because the Apprendi Court declined to overrule Almendarez- Torres, id. at 2362, and we have previously declined to read Apprendi as disturbing the holding of Almendarez-Torres, see United States v. Rush, Nos. 00-2557/2765, 2001 WL 43523, at *2 (8th Cir. Jan. 19, 2001) (per curiam) (Apprendi does not apply to fact of prior conviction); United States v. Aguayo-Delgado, 220 F.3d 926, 932 n.4 (8th Cir.) (“In Apprendi, the Court left Almendarez-Torres untouched, although [it] expressed a willingness to reconsider it.”), cert. denied, 121 S. Ct. 600 (2000).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
1 The Honorable Thomas M. Shanahan, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska. -2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished