[UNPUBLISHED]

George Frye appeals from the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his Age Discrimination in Employment Act complaint. Upon de novo review of the summary judgment record, and viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to Frye, we conclude summary judgment was proper because Frye failed to submit sufficient evidence that Comair’s stated reasons for his termination were a pretext for age discrimination. See Dammen v. UniMed Med. Ctr., 236 F.3d 978, 980 (8th Cir. 2001) (standard of review; burden-shifting analysis).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.