[UNPUBLISHED]

A jury returned a verdict in favor of Cargill, Incorporated, on Keith Kulow’s claim of age discrimination. The District Court 2 entered judgment on the jury verdict and denied Kulow’s motion for a new trial. Kulow timely appeals.

Seeking reversal and remand for a new trial, Kulow argues that the District Court abused its discretion in submitting a verdict form combining what Kulow characterizes as two age discrimination claims into one. Kulow also argues that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting into evidence the testimony of Barb Kula. We disagree with both contentions. Having considered the matter, we conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion in either respect. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.