[UNPUBLISHED]

The District Court 2 enjoined an action filed by plaintiffs in the Northern District of Illinois. After a hearing, the court determined that the Illinois federal action duplicated the instant litigation, which has a long history in our Circuit. See Chicago *667 Truck Drivers, Helpers & Warehouse Workers Union Pension Fund v. Bhd. Labor Leasing, 207 F.3d 500 (8th Cir. 2000); Chicago Truck Drivers, Helpers & Warehouse Workers Union Pension Fund v. Bhd. Labor Leasing, 175 F.3d 1023 (8th Cir. 1999) (table); Chicago Truck Drivers, Helpers & Warehouse Workers Union Pension Fund v. Bhd. Labor Leasing, 166 F.3d 1269 (8th Cir. 1999); Chicago Truck Drivers, Helpers & Warehouse Workers Union Pension Fund v. Bhd. Labor Leasing, 141 F.3d 1167 (8th Cir. 1998) (table). Concluding that defendants will suffer irreparable harm if the Illinois federal action is not enjoined, and pointing out that the proper course of action is for plaintiffs to take measures to enforce the judgment already entered in their favor in the Eastern District of Missouri, the District Court used its authority under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (1994), and enjoined plaintiffs from pursuing their claims in the Northern District of Illinois. Plaintiffs appeal.

Having carefully reviewed the matter, we find no merit in any of plaintiffs’ arguments for reversal. The District Court committed no error of fact, and given the record before us we cannot say the court abused its discretion when it enjoined the redundant federal action in Illinois. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.