Arkansas prisoner Kelvin Love appeals from the district court’s 1 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Love argues the district court erred when it dismissed his complaint without issuing a summons and allowing him to amend his complaint after he had paid the initial partial filing fee. However, the district court may at any time dismiss a case for failure to state a claim, “[notwithstanding any filing fee, or any portion thereof, that may have been paid” see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), and need not allow a prisoner to amend his complaint prior to dismissal, see Christiansen v. Clarke, 147 F.3d 655, 658 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1023, 119 S.Ct. 554, 142 L.Ed.2d 461 (1998). Upon de novo review, see Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam), we agree that Love’s complaint failed to allege a constitutional violation.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.