[UNPUBLISHED]

Rita Graham appeals the district court’s adverse grant of judgment as a matter of law in Graham’s employment discrimination lawsuit. Having reviewed the parties’ briefs, the pretrial record, and a transcript of the district court’s ruling — the only transcript furnished on appeal — we find no grounds for reversal of the challenged ruling on Graham’s claims of race discrimination and retaliation. See Fed. R.App. P. 10(b)(2) (appellant has duty to order transcript); Schmid v. United Bhd. of Carpenters and Joiners, 827 F.2d 384, 386 (8th Cir. 1987) (per curiam) (appellant’s failure to provide complete transcript makes it impossible to review evidence presented at trial), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1071, 108 S.Ct. 1041, 98 L.Ed.2d 1004 (1988). We thus affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.